About
Rett syndrome is a rare but serious neurological disorder that affects about 1 in 9,000 girls. Even more rarely, boys may be affected.
To give you the best experience, this site uses cookies. Learn more about cookies
Translate to:
Rett syndrome is a rare but serious neurological disorder that affects about 1 in 9,000 girls. Even more rarely, boys may be affected.
We aim to share our research findings with families so that they may better understand Rett syndrome and the future for their family.
These resources include the best available evidence about the course of Rett syndrome and its management as well as practical information about family associations, specialist clinical centres and links to relevant websites.
Downs J, Stahlhut M, Wong K, Syhler B, Bisgaard A-M, Jacoby P, et al. (2016) Validating the Rett Syndrome Gross Motor Scale. PLoS ONE 11(1):e0147555. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147555. Download snapshot, see article abstract.
Challenges to motor abilities and movement are common in Rett syndrome. Our study investigated the quality of measurements obtained using the Rett Syndrome Gross Motor Scale, a measure developed to explore gross motor abilities in females with this condition.
We collected video of gross motor skills for 255 girls and women registered with the Australian Rett Syndrome Database. Families showed their daughters' abilities to sit, stand, change position, walk, and more challenging motor skills such as running. Videos were supplemented with a checklist of parent-reported gross motor skills.
Compared with children younger than eight years and taking into account the effects of mutation type, overall motor scores were reduced in adults. Individuals with the p.Arg133Cys, p.Arg294* or p.Arg306Cys mutation achieved better scores than those with a large deletion. The repeatability of clinical assessment using the Rett Syndrome Gross Motor Scale was excellent.
Our study used a large data set to evaluate the quality of measurement of the Rett Syndrome Gross Motor Scale and we found that it was both reliable and valid. We suggest it could be an appropriate measure of gross motor skills in clinical practice and as an outcome measure in clinical trials.